legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Pulido
Defendant Victor Pulido appeals following the February 26, 2013 denial of his petition to recall his sentence under Penal Code section 1170.126.[1] Defendant is currently serving a sentence of 50 years to life plus 10 years.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on this appeal. On June 10, 2013, counsel filed an “opening brief” in which she stated that she had failed to find any arguable issues. On June 11, 2013, we informed defendant that he had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief containing any issues he wished this court to consider. On July 3, 2013, we granted defendant an extension of time. On July 22, 2013, defendant filed a supplemental brief in which he argues that the two strike priors that were used to sentence him as a three-strike defendant constituted a breach of contract.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale