legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re K.B.
K.B. (father) and R.L. (mother), parents of K.B. (the child), appeal from an order issued after the permanency planning hearing that chose adoption as the permanent plan for the child and terminated father’s and mother’s parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26; unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to this code). Both appellants contend the juvenile court erred in concluding the parent-child relationship exception to terminating parental rights (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)) did not apply in this case. In addition, father argues the order must be reversed because the lower court failed to provide proper notice as required under the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.; ICWA). Finding no error, we affirm the juvenile court’s order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale