legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hart
Chilico David Hart (appellant) was convicted and pled no contest to various offenses in four criminal cases, and the trial court imposed a total prison term of five years eight months. Appellant’s counsel has raised no issue on appeal and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Appellant has filed a supplementary brief contending that his sentence is unlawful because the total sentence exceeds the maximum authorized sentence, if periods of probation for which appellant waived custody credits are treated as part of the total sentence. We find no arguable issues and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale