P. v. Le
Defendant Bi Le was arrested and searched subsequent to the arrest. The arresting officer found methamphetamine in his pocket, and defendant pled no contest to possession of methamphetamine after the magistrate denied his motion to suppress the evidence found on him on the ground that the officer lacked probable cause to arrest him. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred in denying his motion. He also contends that the amount of his restitution fine violated the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws. We disagree and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Le