In re J.M.
D.M. (Father) appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to his daughter, J.M., pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] His arguments challenge the juvenile court’s findings of detriment to J.M.'s well-being made at earlier status review hearings, and are therefore not subject to review on appeal from the section 366.26 order. In any event, the orders Father challenges are constitutionally sound and supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.
Comments on In re J.M.