legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Crow v. Sparks
Plaintiffs and respondents Sheryl Crow and Harvey Weinstein sought restraining orders under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6[1] prohibiting defendant and appellant Phillip Gordon Sparks from engaging in harassing conduct and requiring Sparks to stay at least 300 yards away from them. The trial court granted the requested orders after a hearing on August 14, 2012. Sparks timely appealed.[2] Sparks raises a number of contentions, none of which are supported by citations to the record or to legal authority. Because substantial evidence supports the trial court’s orders, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale