Weidl v. Gil
Plaintiff Lorenz Weidl appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendants Jose Gil and Sanjuana Gil on the grounds that Weidl's action was barred by the running of the statute of limitations. In his first amended complaint, Weidl sought damages and injunctive relief for causes of action for trespass, nuisance, negligence and unjust enrichment. We conclude, among other things, that the trial court did not err because: 1) Weidl's causes of action were subject to a three-year statute of limitations, 2) his action was untimely, and 3) he did not meet his burden to produce evidence to show that he fell within the continuing nuisance doctrine. We affirm.
Comments on Weidl v. Gil