In re K.S.
Shawn C. (father) appeals from the dispositional order removing his newborn daughter, K.S., from his custody pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361, and ordering father to drug test.[1] He contends: (1) the order was not supported by substantial evidence; (2) requiring father to drug-test was an abuse of discretion; and (3) there was non-compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). We conclude the dispositional order is supported by substantial evidence, but agree that the case must be remanded for ICWA compliance.
Comments on In re K.S.