In re V.L.
Christopher L.’s parental rights with respect to three of his children were terminated pursuant to section 366.26 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.[1] Christopher L. claims on appeal that the juvenile court erred in failing to apply the parent-child relationship exception to the statutory preference for adoption. He further argues that there was insufficient evidence of unfitness to permit termination of parental rights. We affirm.
Comments on In re V.L.