P. v. Wicker
Andre Wicker appeals from the judgment following his conviction by jury of failure to register as a sex offender (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. (b)).[1] The trial court sentenced him to three years in state prison. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, and contends the court committed prejudicial error by permitting read back of a closing argument in which the prosecutor misstated the requisite intent for a failure to register. He further claims he is entitled to additional days of presentence credit, and respondent correctly concedes the point. We shall modify the judgment accordingly. In all other respects, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Wicker