Pemstein v. Pemstein
In this appeal, Martin Pemstein contends the trial court erred in failing to tax costs as outlined in his unopposed motion. He faults the trial court for requesting additional briefing, considering argument from the prevailing party Harold Pemstein, and awarding Harold[1] costs he was not entitled to receive. We conclude Martin’s arguments lack merit, but because the trial court misinterpreted the scope of the costs award, the order must be reversed and remanded.
Comments on Pemstein v. Pemstein