legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re H.V.
The minor, H.V., appeals from the juvenile court’s May 1, 2013 dispositional order declaring him a ward of the court and committing him to the county juvenile ranch following the minor’s admissions that he committed conspiracy to commit robbery (Pen. Code, § 211)[1] and attempted robbery (§§ 664, 211).
On appeal, the minor challenges a condition of probation that prohibits him from contact with the victim or the victim’s family and requires him to stay at least 100 yards away from the victim and the victim’s residence, vehicle, school, and placement of employment. For reasons that we will explain, we will modify the probation condition to include an explicit knowledge requirement. As so modified, we will affirm the juvenile court’s dispositional order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale