P. v. Sult
On March 26, 2010, the San Bernardino County District Attorney filed an information charging defendant and appellant James Jesse Sult with second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211, counts 1, 11-12, & 20), first degree residential robbery (Pen. Code, § 211, counts 2 & 3), possession of a firearm by a felon with a prior conviction (former Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (a)(1) [now § 29800, subd. (a)(1) (Stats. 2010, ch. 711, § 6)],[1] counts 4, 8, 14, & 21)[2], first degree burglary with a person present (Pen. Code, § 459, counts 5, 13, & 15), attempted carjacking (Pen. Code, §§ 664/215, subd. (a), count 6), assault with a firearm (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(2), count 7), attempted first degree residential robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 664/211, counts 9 & 10), unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a), count 16), evading an officer (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a), count 17), assault upon a peace officer (§ 245, subd. (c), counts 18 & 19), and possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a), count 22). As to counts 1-3, 6, 9-12, and 20, the information alleged that defendant personally used a firearm, within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022.53, subdivision (b). As to counts 5, 7, 13, 15, and 16, the information alleged that defendant personally used a firearm, within the meaning of Penal Code sections 1203.06, subdivision (a)(1), and 12022.5, subdivision (a). The information also alleged that defendant served two prior prison terms. (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b).)[3]
Comments on P. v. Sult