McNeley v. Swift Transportation
Plaintiff and appellant Dillard McNeley appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in this employment action in favor of defendant and respondent Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC.[1] McNeley makes only one argument on appeal—he contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment of his wrongful termination cause of action because after his doctor wrote that he needed a 90-day leave of absence due to stress, Swift prepared a personal leave of absence form granting only a 30-day leave, which McNeley did not request or sign. McNeley characterizes the Swift form as “fraudulent†and contrary to the terms of his employment agreement, resulting in his unlawful employment termination when he did not return to work after 30 days. We affirm.
Comments on McNeley v. Swift Transportation