P. v. Pipkin
Defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting, under Evidence Code section 1101, subdivision (b), evidence that defendant committed a prior bad act. First, defendant contends that the prior bad act was not sufficiently similar to the charged offense to support the inference that appellant harbored the same intent. Second, defendant contends that the evidence of the prior bad act was unduly prejudicial.
Comments on P. v. Pipkin