P. v. Arthur
A jury convicted defendant of attempted robbery, false imprisonment, and other charges arising from an alleged home invasion robbery. Defendant contends that the trial court prejudicially erred by: (1) failing to adequately investigate whether one of the jurors slept during material portions of the trial, and (2) upholding a defense witness's refusal to testify on Fifth Amendment grounds. Defendant contends in the alternative that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his attempted robbery conviction. Court find no reversible error or insufficiency of the evidence, and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Arthur