legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PRIEBE v. NELSON PART-II
Veterinarian's rule under which dog owners who contract with veterinarians to treat their dogs are exempt from liability, should their dog bite a veterinarian during treatment, also bars kennel worker's strict liability claim against a dog owner under Civil Code Sec. 3342 for injuries sustained from a dog bite or attack while worker was caring for owner's dog boarded at kennel. Kennel worker's allegations that dog owner failed to disclose that dog was predisposed to bite and attack people could be relevant on retrial to common law strict liability and negligence causes of action. This action may be maintained if owner of a domestic animal that bites or injures another person knew or had reason to know of animal's vicious propensities.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale