P. v. Lowerison
Appellant received a six-year suspended prison sentence and was placed on felony probation. The court later ordered the six-year term after appellant admitted a violation of probation. Appellant argues that court must remand for resentencing because the trial court erroneously believed it did not have the discretion to reinstate probation and because it increased a previously-ordered restitution fine when it sentenced appellant on the probation violation. Court reject the first contention, but agree with the second.
Comments on P. v. Lowerison