Lee v. Ing
Tony Ing appeal s from a money judgment in favor of respondent Thomas Lee. He argues that Lee’s claims, based on Ing’s alleged misappropriation of $1 million Lee had given Ing in 2008 to invest in currency trading, were barred by the statute of limitations and not subject to the delayed discovery rule. Ing also argues that the unclean hands doctrine precludes Lee’s recovery because Lee engaged in tax fraud in an earlier investment in a medical center. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Lee v. Ing