legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Moatazedi v. Bostajani
Plaintiff sued defendant to establish a 50 percent interest in an airport shuttle service owned by defendant. Plaintiff alleged he had purchased an option to buy the interest in April 1992 and that defendant denied plaintiff had any interest in the business. Defendant, relying upon the doctrine of judicial estoppel and plaintiff's failure to list the option as an asset in his November 1992 bankruptcy petition, moved for judgment on the pleadings. Based upon the allegations in plaintiff's complaint and matters properly the subject of judicial notice, the trial court granted defendant's motion. Plaintiff, seeking a reversal of the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale