In re B.R.
Defendant and appellant J.R. (Father) is the father of N.R. (a female born November 2011) and B.R. (a male born June 2013) as well as five other children (collectively, the children). Defendant and appellant Ja.R. (Sister; a female born October 1998) is the oldest of the children.[1] Father and Sister contend that the juvenile dependency court erred in (1) denying Sister’s Welfare and Institutions Code[2] section 388 petition; and (2) failing to find the sibling relationship exception under section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(v), applicable to the termination of parental rights. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court’s orders.
Comments on In re B.R.