Said v. The Regents of the University of Californi
Shary Said appeals from the judgment[1] in favor of the Regents of the University of California (the Regents) and Terry Belmont (collectively referred to as defendants). Despite identifying herself as a volunteer for the University of California, Irvine (UCI), Medical Center (Medical Center), she alleged numerous causes of action (COAs) based on assertions she was an employee. She also stated claims for breach of contract, defamation, and discrimination, among others. Many of the COAs were dismissed on demurrer, and the others were decided against Said on summary judgment.
Said challenges the rulings on the demurrers and summary judgment motions, as well as those on discovery issues, motions to continue the hearing on the motions for summary judgment, and ex parte applications. Having considered all of the issues raised by Said in her opening brief, we conclude no error occurred and affirm the judgment. We decline to address any contentions made for the fi
Comments on Said v. The Regents of the University of Californi