In re J.R.
Appellant J.R. appeals from the juvenile court’s finding that he violated the terms and conditions of his juvenile probation by not following the rules and regulations of the Youth Services Center (Center),and imposing an increase of one year to his custodial time in the Center. He contends: (1) the condition allegedly breached was not proven to have been imposed as a condition of his probation; (2) even if imposed, there was not substantial evidence that he violated that condition; (3) the condition of probation did not include “attempts” to violate that condition; (4) the condition he allegedly violated was unconstitutionally vague; and (5) the court abused its discretion in extending his custodial time by an additional year. Further, appellant asserts that his due process rights were violated because the probation violation notice did not advise him that the prosecution would seek to increase his custodial time as a result of the alleged violations.[1]
We reject
Comments on In re J.R.