Reynolds v. Cornerstone Staffing Solutions
Defendant appeals from a court order denying its petition to compel arbitration of claims for disability discrimination and unfair business practices, among other causes of action, asserted by its former employee. Defendant contends the trial court erred in concluding that the arbitration agreement between the parties is unconscionably one-sided and thus unenforceable under Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83 (Armendariz). Although the court considers the question to be exceptionally close, the ourt conclude that appellant is correct and shall reverse the decision.
Comments on Reynolds v. Cornerstone Staffing Solutions