In re Kaitlyn A.
In this dependency appeal, Shayla G. (mother)challenges the jurisdictional finding and dispositional order which led to the removal of her young daughter, Kaitlyn A. (born May 2015), from her custody.Specifically, mother arguesthatthe juvenile court’s jurisdictional finding under subdivision (b) of section 300 of the Welfare and Institutions Code must be reversed because it is not supported by substantial evidence.[1]Mother also claims that the juvenile court’s dispositional order removing Kaitlyn from parental custody was not sufficiently supported by evidenceof risk to the minor and that reasonable means existed to keep the minor safe in mother’s care. Finally, mother challenges the sufficiency of the required noticing under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq., contending it was deficient. Seeing no error requiring reversal of the juvenile court’s challenged findings and orders, we affirm.
Comments on In re Kaitlyn A.