Cavic v. Schreiber
In his brief on appeal,Cavic makes no mention of any of the underlying orders, nor indeed of the trial court’s entry of judgment, except to note the bare fact that the trial court denied his judicial disqualification motionand allegedly entered the dismissal “without any explanation” beyond his failure to post security. Cavic does not directly challenge either of these rulings, nor the others listed in his notice of appeal. Instead, he uses his brief as a clarion call to the electorate. He states, “People of the Orange County, wake up, we are in the election year and we have a major job to do, to chase away all of those corrupted Santa Ana Court Judges, such as O’Leary, Aronson, Fybel, Bauer, Horn and Margines!!”
Because this claim is directed to the voters for their consideration, we express no opinion on it. As a basis for appeal, however, Cavic does not suggest in his brief that he raised his claim of alleged corruptionbelow to oppose any of t
Comments on Cavic v. Schreiber