In re Samuel P.
In this juvenile dependency case, defendant and appellant T.B. (Mother) appeals the juvenile court’s sole jurisdictional finding against her, namely that she failed to protect her three children from their father’s illicit drug use.[1] Mother also challenges the juvenile court’s dispositional order to the extent it requires her to participate in individual counseling sessions to address “case issues” other than domestic violence victimization. Because we conclude substantial evidence does not support the juvenile court’s finding that Mother failed to protect her children from their father’s illicit drug use, we reverse the jurisdictional finding against Mother. To the extent the challenged dispositional order requires Mother’s individual counseling to address issues other than domestic violence victimization, we reverse that as well.
Comments on In re Samuel P.