legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Rodriguez
A jury convicted Said Rodriguez of possession of methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378); possession of a smoking device (Health & Saf. Code,
§ 11364, subd. (a)); conspiracy to sell or transport a controlled substance (Pen. Code,
§ 182, subd. (a); Health & Saf. Code, § 11379) and being in a place where controlled substances were used (Health & Saf. Code, § 11365, subd. (a)).
The court sentenced Rodriguez to a split sentence consisting of one year in county jail followed by two years of mandatory supervision. On appeal, Rodriguez contends the court reversibly erred by denying his motion to suppress his confession because although he was advised of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436, 444 (Miranda), his confession was involuntary. Rodriguez also requests that we review the transcript of the sealed proceedings that Judge Altamirano conducted under People v. Hobbs (1994) 7 Cal.4th 948 (Hobbs), for us to determine whether his motion t

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale