legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Raskin v. Petroysyan
Alex Raskin (plaintiff) filed the present action against Armen Petrosyan (aka Armin Roberts) (defendant) and others on October 20, 2010, and filed the operative sixth amended complaint on May 30, 2014. The operative complaint alleged that defendant held himself out as an experienced art broker/dealer and persuaded plaintiff to purchase works of art for 10 to 20 times their actual value. The complaint asserted causes of action for intentional and negligent misrepresentation, intentional and negligent concealment, conversion, and rescission.
Defendant filed a cross-complaint against Raskin for breach of written contract and reasonable value of goods delivered. The cross-complaint asserted that plaintiff purchased approximately 108 paintings from defendant at a combined cost of over $6,000,000. After a series of disputes arose between plaintiff and defendant, the parties entered a “Mutual General Release” (general release) that purported to release each party from exist

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale