legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Halsema
Defendant John Lawrence Halsema shot his friend and housemate Craig Davies in the back, killing him. Nine or ten days later, defendant called police to report the shooting, stating that it had been an accident.
A jury found defendant guilty of murder in the second degree (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189),[1] and found true an allegation that his personal use of a firearm resulted in Davies’s death. (§ 12022.53, subd. (d).) However, finding that the trial court committed prejudicial instructional error, this court reversed the judgment and remanded for retrial.[2] At defendant’s second trial, a jury again found defendant guilty of second degree murder and found true the enhancement allegation that defendant personally used a firearm resulting in the death of Davies.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale