In re Leila C.
Danielle C., mother of minors Mia C. and Leila C., appeals from juvenile courtorders terminating parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.26, 395.)[1]Joseph K., father of Leila, also appeals from the order pertaining to Leila.
Mother contends (1) although a challenge to the denial of reunification services would normally be barred at this stage of the proceeding, mother should be permitted to challenge the denial because she was not informed of the right to seek appellate review by writ petition; (2) the juvenile court erred in denying reunification services because there is insufficient evidence to support the finding that mother did not make reasonable efforts to treatthe problems that led to aprior termination of services; and (3)the orders terminating parental rights should be reversed because the juvenile court failed to comply with the inquiry and notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.)
Joseph K., w
Comments on In re Leila C.