legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Xavier C.
Xavier C. appeals the juvenile court's judgment declaring him a ward of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602[1] and placing him on probation, and a subsequent order modifying the terms and conditions of probation. On appeal, Xavier asserts the probation condition restricting his use of computers to school-related activities is unreasonable under People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481 (Lent) and overbroad. Xavier also asserts, and the Attorney General concedes, that the trial court erred by failing to award him predisposition custody credits and not specifying the maximum period of confinement. We reject Xavier's contention that the probation condition was unreasonable and overbroad, but remand for the juvenile court to calculate predisposition custody credits and the maximum period of confinement.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale