P. v. Condee
Christopher Condee appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction by jury on one count each of attempted first degree burglary, first degree residential robbery,first degree residential burglary, and false imprisonment by violence. (Pen.Code, §§ 664/459, 211, 459, 236.)[1] Appellant contends that his conviction for attempted burglary was not supported by substantial evidence. Appellant also contends, and respondent concedes, that the trial court should have stayed his false imprisonment sentence pursuant to section 654. Finally, appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion under People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero) to dismiss his strike. We conclude that the trial court should have stayed the false imprisonment sentence but otherwise affirm.
Comments on P. v. Condee