In re T.M.
T.M. was detained by the juvenile courtbecauseher parents were unable to safely care for her and their drug abuse put her at risk of serious harm. Following 12 months of reunification services, T.M.’s father, B.M. (Father), continued to use drugs and was unable to show he could properly care for her, despite his desire to reunify with his daughter. The juvenile court terminated reunification services and set a Welfare and Institutions Code Section 366.26[1]permanency planning hearing. Prior to the hearing, Father filed a section 388 modification petition requesting reinstatement of reunification services. The court denied the modification request and terminated Father’s parental rights, finding the permanent plan of adoption appropriate. Father appeals the termination of his parental rights and the denial of his section 388 petition. Because neither order was erroneous, we affirm.
Comments on In re T.M.