legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Marriage of Hughes
Michelle Hughes appeals a family court order denying her motion brought under Family Code section 2121 et seq. to set aside the judgment of dissolution. She contends: the family court erred by failing to grant a continuance despite the fact she and her attorney were effectively unavailable due to medical reasons and failing to award attorney fees and costs early enough in litigation to put the parties on an equal playing field. She further contends certain of the court's rulings are not supported by the evidence. We affirm the order, concluding Michelle's arguments are waived because they fail to address the merits of Judge Parker's ruling on the motion to set aside.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale