O&M v. Aldridge Pite LLP
Aldridge Pite LLP, successor by merger to Pite Duncan, LLP and Diane Elizabeth Bond (collectively Pite) appeal from an order denying their special motion to strike[1] the malicious prosecution complaint filed against them and their client, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo)[2] by O&M, LLC (O&M) and its property manager, Nexus Development Corporation, Central Division (Nexus) (collectively O&M). Pite contends O&M failed to carry its burden of showing no reasonable attorney would have found the underlying action tenable or that it was brought with malice. Pite further argues the trial court erred in overruling three evidentiary objections. We disagree and affirm the order.
Comments on O&M v. Aldridge Pite LLP