P. v. Mendoza
Rafael Mendoza appeals a judgment following his jury convictions for three counts of second degree burglary (Pen. Code,§ 459)[1]; one count of receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)); one count of possession of burglary tools (§ 466); and one count of resisting a peaceofficer (§ 148, subd. (a)(1)). Mendoza contends his convictions for burglary and possession of burglary tools must be reversed because of prejudicial jury instruction errors. We disagree and therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Mendoza