Almuete v. Cambe
Defendant Eileen W. Cambe appeals from a judgment for plaintiff Rodilyn Almuete following a bench trial on Almuete’s claim that Cambe breached a promissory note obligation to repay money that Almuete loaned her. Cambe argues that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s findings of breach and resulting damages. Cambe also argues that the doctrine of judicial estoppel precludes Almuete from asserting her claim in this litigation because she failed to disclose the unrepaid loans as an asset in a federal bankruptcy petition that she filed before suing Cambe. Cambe’s arguments lack merit. Therefore, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on Almuete v. Cambe