P. v. Ndiagu
Christopher Ndiagu appeals from a judgment and sentence, following his convictions for driving under the influence causing injury and driving with a blood alcohol level over .08 percent causing injury. He contends the trial court denied him his right to present a defense and to cross-examine witnesses when it ruled that he could not present evidence of three other drivers’ blood alcohol levels. We conclude the court did not exclude such evidence at trial and accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Ndiagu