P. v. Simonian
Danny Simonian appeals from an order denying his petition seeking to recall his sentence for false imprisonment and resentence him under the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012, enacted by the voters as Proposition 36. The trial court summarily found Simonian ineligible for resentencing without stating any reason for its decision. Because Simonian sought resentencing for a qualified three-strike sentence and his petition listed only nondisqualifying prior offenses, we reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider Simonian’s petition.
Comments on P. v. Simonian