P. v. S.G.
S.G. appeals an order extending his involuntary commitment because he represents “a substantial danger of physical harm to others” because of a mental disorder (Pen. Code, §§ 1026, 1026.5[1]), after having been found not guilty by reason of insanity for attempted murder (§§ 664, 187, 1026). We conclude, among other things, that S.G. has not shown that the trial court erred in making its evidentiary rulings. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. S.G.