P. v. Guerrero
Defendant claims on appeal that he was not fully advised of his federal constitutional rights to a jury trial, to remain silent, and to confront witnesses, before admitting he suffered the prior convictions used to enhance his sentence. He insists this case should be remanded for a trial on the prior convictions. Under the totality of the circumstances, defendant voluntarily and intelligently waived his rights.
Comments on P. v. Guerrero