P. v. Eppstein
On appeal, he contends that (1) the trial court prejudicially erred in admitting a group of spreadsheets under Evidence Code section 1521 because the spreadsheets contained inadmissible hearsay, (2) the trial court prejudicially erred in permitting a prosecution witness to testify about her preparation of the “allocations” on the spreadsheets because her testimony was based on inadmissible hearsay, (3) the court prejudicially erred in restricting cross-examination of two prosecution witnesses, (4) the three grand theft convictions constituted just one offense and must be aggregated into a single conviction, and (5) defendant’s trial counsel was prejudicially deficient in failing to challenge one of the grand theft counts on statute of limitations grounds. We reverse the judgment because the trial court prejudicially erred in admitting hearsay evidence. We also conclude that defendant’s three grand theft counts must be aggregated into a single grand theft count.
Comments on P. v. Eppstein