Fink v. Superior Court
Appellant filed a petition for writ of mandate challenging various trial court orders in this $10,000 debt collection case. For most of the orders appellant has an adequate remedy at law, and the court denied the petition on those issues. Appellant raises one issue, however, for which he does not have an adequate remedy and which must be addressed now to avoid irreparable injury. Once Appellant was granted a fee waiver, he is required to advise the court of any changes in his ability to pay the court fees. Because the order was not appropriate at that time, there was no ruling on this issue. But the court did point out that the order seemed excessive.
Palma notice was given. (Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171, 180.)
Comments on Fink v. Superior Court