In re David C.
Appellant mother challenges the juvenile court's decision to terminate her parental rights and set adoption as the permanent plan for her three minor children. Mother contends substantial evidence does not support the juvenile court's finding that the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) did not apply to the minors. After a careful review of the law and the record in this case, we conclude that the juvenile court's findings are supported by substantial evidence.
Comments on In re David C.