P. v. Cisneros CA4/3
A jury convicted defendant Jose Roberto Cisneros of first degree residential burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 460, subd. (a)) and found true that a nonaccomplice was present during the burglary (§ 667.5, subd. (c)(21)). Defendant admitted a prior serious felony conviction for which he had served a prison term. (§§ 667, 667.5, subd. (b), 1170.12.) After considering the probation officer’s report, the court denied defendant’s motion to strike his prior strike and sentenced him to prison for 13 years.
Defendant appealed the judgment and we appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel did not argue against defendant, but advised he was unable to find an issue to argue on defendant’s behalf. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was given an opportunity to file written argument on his own behalf, but he did not do so.
Comments on P. v. Cisneros CA4/3