In re C.L. CA4/3
C.A. (Mother) and I.L. (Father) appeal from the judgment terminating parental rights to their now two-year-old son, C.L. Father contends the juvenile court erred in summarily denying his Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 modification petition. Both parents maintain the court should have applied the “parental benefit exception” to adoption. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) We find no errors and affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re C.L. CA4/3