In re R.G. CA2/1
R.G. (father) and B.G. (mother) appeal from a dependency jurisdictional order finding that the juvenile court had jurisdiction over their 16-year-old son, R.G., pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (a) and (b)(1). Father and mother contend the juvenile court erred in not dismissing the dependency petition when it found that conditions justifying the initial assumption of jurisdiction no longer existed at the time of the combined jurisdiction and disposition hearing. We agree, and reverse.
Comments on In re R.G. CA2/1