legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Ballesteros CA2/3
A jury found defendants and appellants Alejandro and Oswaldo Ballesteros guilty of assault with a semiautomatic firearm and found true gang allegations. To prove the gang allegations, a gang expert testified that in forming his opinion defendants are gang members he relied on field identification cards (“FI cards”). At least some of those FI cards were displayed to the jury, even though details in them were not admissible. On appeal, defendants raise numerous contentions about the FI card evidence. We conclude that the trial court erred in allowing the cards to be shown to the jury and that the error was prejudicial. We therefore reverse the true findings on the gang enhancement allegations, although we reject or need not address defendants’ remaining contentions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale