legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re V.R. CA2/1
T.R. (Mother) appeals from the dependency court’s order terminating her parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 to her twin daughters, V.R. and A.R. (born in October 2011). Without contesting the merits of the order, Mother contends it should be reversed because the court and the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) did not inquire of the children’s father whether he had Indian ancestry and thus failed to comply with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). DCFS does not oppose remand for the proper ICWA inquiry, but nonetheless argues that the matter should be remanded without reversing the termination order. We disagree and accordingly, we conditionally reverse the termination order and remand for compliance with the ICWA notice requirements.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale